Over the last 140 years, the federal government has expanded its powers over the people and the states in direct violation of constitutional law. Over that time, the international elite have infiltrated and taken control of our monetary and political systems. The only salvation, if there is to be one, is when the American people decide to uphold and defend the Constitution, pushing the federal government back into operating within some confines of constitutional law.

Recently, President Obama accepted a Chair position over the UN Security Council. In accepting that office, he violated the constitutional prohibition on accepting an office from a foreign power without first getting permission from Congress. But, as there is no penalty attached to the prohibition, it has been completely ignored. If a politician accepts gifts, offices, pensions, or emoluments from foreign powers, where does his allegiance reside? How do we stop our politicians from being corrupted by foreign money and influences?

Today, one of the most notorious organization’s setup to corrupt our political system and influence our laws and policies is the Bilderbergs. It is comprised of Queen’s, King’s, Prince’s, and agents of many foreign powers. It is a violation of the Logan Act for an American politician to attend their secret meetings, but more importantly, it’s a violation of our constitutional prohibition on titles of nobility as outlined in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7. Do the Bilderbergs pay for the limousines that take our politicians to theses secret affairs? How about the food they eat, awards they receive, and the massive amounts of money that is channeled into their election campaign funds?

Wouldn’t it be great if we had a strong law to get rid of many of these corrupt politicians? Well take heart America, we do.

For over 180 years, the U.S. government, courts, and historians have held that an amendment to the federal Constitution called “Titles of Nobility and Honour [sic]”, proposed by Congress in 1810, that attached a penalty of loss of citizenship to Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7 of the Constitution, had not been ratified by a sufficient number of the several States.

After 26 years of intense research by many historical records investigators, and based on certified government records, we can now prove beyond any doubt that it was lawfully ratified and adopted as law from 1821 to 1827 before being illegally removed from the 1828 Laws of the United States. As it was never lawfully repealed, it is still the law and reads as follows;

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them”.

If the people of this nation, come to realize, that we were illegally stripped of this powerful law, and work to have it restored and recognized, it would represent a “New American Revolution” whereby we could legally regain our Republic and cast out those who are disloyal to the United States and Americanism.

The potential draconian ramifications would have a dramatic impact on issues of national security, the banking industry, and special interest politics, to say the least. Any citizen who accepted a present, pension, emolument, gift, or bribe from any foreign power or agent of that foreign power could conceivably lose everything and become a person without a nation.

I think its obvious why politicians and attorneys back then, did not want to see Article XIII continue as law. But, it’s still the law, just waiting for the American people to stand up and recognize it. I suggest that you don’t put too much stock into all the hype that’s on the Internet claiming that Article XIII, Titles of Nobility and Honour [sic] was not adopted. Instead look at the hard cold evidence, and judge for yourself.

I have spent 5 years researching this issue and made a number of new discoveries along the way. If you have never heard of this law, I recommend you visit http://www.amendment-13.org.

If a politician were stripped of his/her citizenship for violating this prohibition, would it not also effect the laws, acts, and policies that they illegally voted on?